Issues : Errors in GE
|
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
None of the editions added the naturals returning f3 and f2 that Chopin overlooked in A. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The fingering digits written in A were overlooked in GE (→FE→EE). Chopin confirmed this fingering with an entry in FED. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
It is difficult to say what the motivation of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE) was while he overlooked four very distinct long accents of A. He may have considered them to be superfluous in the face of the accents of the R.H. In GE2 the accents were reproduced as short. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The change of subtle motivic slurs, written in A on the 1st and 3rd beats of the bar, to the slurs embracing the entire sextuplets is certainly an arbitrary simplification of GE (→FE→EE). Cf. bar 24. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
