Issues : Errors in GE
|
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The missing accent in the editions is almost certainly one of a few inaccuracies of the engraver of GE1 in this bar (cf. the remaining notes on this beat of the bar). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The absence of the slur embracing the grace nots is probably a result of inattention of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
It is difficult to find an objective behind combining the slurs above the rest, hence the slur of GE1 (→FE→EE) is most probably a mistake of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The version of GE1 is certainly erroneous: it is most probably a revised Terzverschreibung error, by adding a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
According to us, the fact of removing the accents by Chopin in a proofreading of GE1 (→FE→EE) is less likely than them having been accidentally overlooked by the engraver (there are more similar inaccuracies, both in this and the previous bar). GE2 restored the accents (as short). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
. Chopin restored the chord with c2, written in 
