Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we omit the staccato dots of unknown origin in the 2nd half of the bar. According to us, it is highly unlikely that they were added by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The typical long accent visible in A was falsely reproduced in the editions as a diminuendo hairpin, which would frequently happen in Chopin's works – cf. e.g. the Etude in A minor, Op. 10 No. 2, bar 8 and 12. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Omission of the staccato dots by the engraver of GE1 can be understood, since they are poorly visible in A, particularly the second one that blends in with the ending of the stem of the chord in the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The staccato dot on the last crotchet is certainly a mistake of the engraver of GE1. The error was not repeated in any of the remaining editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 71-72
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Short accents in EE is an inaccuracy resulting from not using the sign of a long accent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies |
in 
