Issues : Authentic post-publication changes and variants

b. 1

composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major

The version of A (→GEFEEE)

The version of FEFr corrected by the editors

..

Franchomme described the variant of the Nocturne opening recorded in FEFr as „the change made by the author”. We correct the obviously erroneous a flat on the last semiquaver of each group to f.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in FEFr , Authentic post-publication changes and variants

b. 1

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt IV

sotto voce e legato in GC (→GE) & FE (→EE)

 & slur in Afin

..

Chopin wrote the same idea differently while preparing the Sonata for print and while writing an occasional autograph gift fragment of the finale. The version of Afin, although later, can be considered only trivia.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic post-publication changes and variants

b. 1-12

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt IV

..

The non-separated slur of Afin corresponds to the legato indication in the printed version.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic post-publication changes and variants

b. 1-4

composition: Op. 64 No 1, Waltz in D♭ major

No introduction in As

4 bars in AI, AII, AIII & A (→FEGE,EE)

4 bars with fingering written in FED

8 bars with fingering in FED

8 bars without teaching fingering

..

The addition in FED – trill 4 bars – probably means a variant of beginning the Waltz in a way similar to the return of the main section from bar 69. We give each of the variants – four- and eight-bar – in the version with fingering, written also in FED, or without.

As starts right away with accompaniment, which corresponds with bar 5 of the version of later autographs and editions.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Main-line changes , Differences in form

b. 1

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

in A (→GE) & EE

No indication in FE

written into FES

..

The absence of a dynamic indication is most probably an oversight of the engraver of FE. The addition of  in EE was performed probably on the basis of a comparison with bar 91. In turn, the  indication written in FES, in spite of the fact that there are no reasons to question its authenticity, is, however, most probably only an ad hoc lesson comment, correcting the absence of the dynamic indication in FE. Therefore, we do not consider it to be an expression of a general change of the dynamic concept of this introduction. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FES , Authentic post-publication changes and variants