Issues : Rhythmic errors
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In A there is no dot extending the a crotchet, which is a patent oversight. The dot is present in all the remaining sources. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , FE revisions , Fontana's revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The first octave in the L.H. in A is a quaver, so that the bar includes only 7 quavers. The mistake was corrected in GE (→FE→EE), by replacing the quaver with a crotchet, which we consider an accurate interpretation of the notation of A: Chopin probably erroneously repeated the rhythmic value of the chord in the R.H., as it was in the four previous bars. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
||||||||
|
b. 25-27
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In bars 25-28 A initially had the rhythm category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors resulting from corrections , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
||||||||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In GE5 the last note is an erroneous quaver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Rhythmic errors |
||||||||
|
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
Determining Chopin's intention related to the rhythm on the 3rd beat of the bar seems impossible here. A erroneously has a quaver and two demisemiquavers ( category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Authentic corrections of FE |
. Later, Chopin was adding dots and beams, yet inaccurately, omitting the 2nd dot on the 2nd beat of bar 25 and on the 2nd and 3rd beats of bar 27. Those errors were corrected in 
) in the upper voice. The text of 
. That latter rhythms was corrected both in