Issues : Rhythmic errors
|
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In GE3 the e-e1 octave is a quaver, as a result of which the bar has only 7 quavers in the part of the L.H. The rhythmic error proves that the quaver flag in this place was printed by mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Rhythmic errors |
||||||||
|
b. 18
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
The rhythm written on the 2nd beat of the bar both in A1 and the copies of [A2] – CJ and CK (as well as EL) – is either incomplete (missing indication of an irregular group) or erroneous (the semiquavers should have been demisemiquavers). In order to minimise the scope of an editorial intervention, in the main text we suggest the former; the latter was implemented by Balakirev in his copy. In practice, the difference between them is negligible. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Rhythmic errors |
||||||||
|
b. 20
|
composition: WN 55, Waltz in F minor
..
In the F sources (PE, FEF and GEF), on the 1st beat in the R.H. there are two parts with an e
In AR, there is a poorly visible e category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Rhythmic errors |
||||||||
|
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
||||||||
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In the part of the L.H. A has two crotchets and a quaver, hence the bar has only five quavers. On the basis of the alignment of the notes to the R.H., it turns out that Chopin most probably overlooked the dots extending the first octave. The dots were added in a proofing of FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
1 dotted minim in the bottom voice. We consider this version to be erroneous, since the extension of the e
was omitted. This patent error was corrected both in