Issues : Errors in GE
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor
..
In A there is no accidental before the 1st note in the 4th group of demisemiquavers, which should therefore be interpreted as a1. A comparison with analogous b. 1 proves Chopin's mistake; it is also the before the next a2 that confirms a1 as the intended pitch of that note. The natural was added in FC and FE (→EE); however, it is absent in GE, which is probably an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in GE , Cautionary accidentals , Errors of A , FE revisions , Fontana's revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
The 3rd quaver in GE1 is a c2 (with a ). At this pitch, a natural does not cancel anything; in turn, it deprives the 6th and 9th semiquavers of necessary alterations, which points to a Terzverschreibung mistake, irrespective of the compliant version of the remaining sources. The error was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 17, Prelude in A♭ major
..
The version of GE1 featuring f2 on the 3rd quaver is most probably a mistake of the engraver. In GE2 f2 was rightly changed to g2; at the same time, a cautionary was added before the latter. We include this addition, which we find justified, in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 17, Prelude in A♭ major
..
The missing a notes in the chords in the 2nd half of the bar are a mistake of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
All source notations of the 2nd half of the bar are erroneous or unclear, however, none of them can be corrected in a way that would not be questioned.
In this situation, we base the main text on the version of A which, in spite of its inaccuracies, seems to be the most reliable, as far as the authenticity is concerned. Out of two natural possibilities of correcting the mistake (changing two demisemiquavers to hemidemisemiquavers or deleting one of the dots extending the e1 quaver) we choose the second, giving a smoother development of the figuration introducing the main theme. We suggest a modified version of FE as an alternative version. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in GE , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |