![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 1, b. 1-12
Afrag - Autograph fragment
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
Just like in the previous, analogous situations – b. 6-7 and 30-31 – in the main text we give the continuous slur of GE, almost certainly reproducing the notation of [A2]. The variants of the version with separated slurs stem from the imprecise notation of A1, in which the slur ending in b. 62 (which is a repetition of b. 6) may be interpreted as reaching the minim, the end of the bar or the beginning of b. 63.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues:
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
Afrag, A1, FE1, FE2, FED, GE1, GE2, EE1