data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
FE1
compare
Just like in the previous, analogous situations – b. 6-7 and 30-31 – in the main text we give the continuous slur of GE, almost certainly reproducing the notation of [A2]. The variants of the version with separated slurs stem from the imprecise notation of A1, in which the slur ending in b. 62 (which is a repetition of b. 6) may be interpreted as reaching the minim, the end of the bar or the beginning of b. 63.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
notation: Slurs