Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 1-28
p. 1
p. 2
p. 3
p. 4, b. 1-28
p. 5, b. 29-45
p. 6, b. 46-70
p. 7, b. 71-95
p. 8, b. 96-117
p. 9, b. 118-143
p. 10, b. 144-173
p. 11, b. 174-205
p. 12, b. 206-229
p. 13, b. 230-247
p. 14, b. 248-269
p. 15, b. 270-295
p. 16, b. 296-325
p. 17, b. 326-359
p. 18, b. 360-395
p. 19, b. 396-431
p. 20, b. 432-468
FE1 - First French edition
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF FE1 - First French edition


  b. 5

In the absence of [A], it is difficult to determine whether the curved line over the g notes in FE (→GE,EE) is a tie sustaining those notes or a motivic slur (in Chopin's autographs, the differentiation is possible due to the shape of the curved lines). According to us, it is a motivic slur that is more likely here.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccuracies in FE, EE inaccuracies, Tie or slur

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEJ, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2, EE3