![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 5, b. 39-49
GE1 - First German edition
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
The slur of FE, most probably erroneous, could have corresponded, to a certain extent, to the notation of the base text – written with panache, reaching far beyond the rests slurs are not infrequent in Chopin's autographs (e.g., in the Mazurka in G minor, Op. 24 No. 1, bars 16 and 18), not to mention Gutmann's copies (e.g., in the Scherzo in C minor, Op. 39, bar 56). Who knows whether the slur added in the part of the L.H. was not supposed to be a sui generis correction of the inaccurate slur of the R.H.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
AI, A, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, CDP, GE1b