|
b. 22-23
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
The difference in slurring can have a minimal impact on the performance in this case, hence in the main text we give the version of the principal source, which is FC (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
The sources do not include a category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Errors of FC , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||
|
b. 24-25
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
According to us, the long accent visible in FE corresponds to the notation of [A], hence we give it in the main text. We believe that the short accents of both FC (→GE) and EE resulted from an inaccurate reproduction of their respective bases. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FC |
in 
restoring b
on the 3rd beat of the bar, which means that this accidental was also absent in [A]. In the main text, we correct this oversight, patent in this harmonic context and generally fairly typical of Chopin.
