data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Both manuscripts are missing a few necessary accidentals in this bar – a to g
2 and naturals to g2, d1 and g1. In addition, in AsI the
to d2 is missing. On the other hand, in A there is an unjustified
to c1 in the last L.H. figure. The latter and both accidentals written in A to the topmost R.H. notes are placed much lower than the noteheads they concern.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information
issues: Accidentals in different octaves, Cautionary accidentals, Omission of current key accidentals, Accidental below/above the note, Inaccuracies in A
notation: Pitch