![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The missing ten. must be an oversight or revision (the stem prolonging b2 was also overlooked/omitted). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In FE, the quaver beam of thirds on the 2nd beat was mistakenly omitted. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
It seems unlikely that Chopin would have removed from FE1 the second part of the indication on purpose, although it is actually completely unnecessary in this context – due to its position, ben marcato can concern only the topmost R.H. notes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The accents in A are shorter than the ones over the bass notes in this bar, but the difference is so insignificant that it is uncertain which marks Chopin meant here. The absence of marks in both impressions of FE is either an oversight or a revision – the latter seems more likely, especially in the case of FESB, which was based on GE2, during the final period of its presence on the market, hence when the plates must have already been as worn out as evidenced by the copy presented in our system. Upon seeing the very clear outlines of the removed elements, they could have assumed that the accents over d1 were the remaining elements of the initial, misplaced marks and that it is only the accents over the bass notes that should stay. Anyways, a possible change introduced by Chopin while proofreading FE1 seems less likely than one of the above possibilities. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 39-40
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in b. 35-36, in A Chopin overlooked some necessary accidentals, mainly in b. 40 – a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |