Issues : Inaccuracies in A
b. 309
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
Single marks appear in Chopin's pieces quite rarely and – apart from the pieces' endings – most often result from oversights of marks supposed to complete them. According to us, this is also the case here – starting from the mark at the beginning of this bar, there are no more pedal marks in A until the end of the line of text (in bar 311), which points to momentary distraction. Due to the above, in the main text we suggest adding a , in accordance with the harmonic sense. Such a mark was also added in EE, almost in the same place. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , No pedal release mark , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 309
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The to the bottom note of the octave on the 3rd beat of the bar, overlooked in the manuscripts, was added right away in GE1 and repeated in the remaining editions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 313
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||||
b. 313-314
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
This note concerns the 4 fingering digits at the end of bar 313 and on the 1st beat of bar 314, whose interpretation in the principal sources does not raise any difficulties – excluding the digit over the 1st semiquaver in bar 314, which we discuss separately. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A , |
|||||||||||
b. 314
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The fingering digit written in A could be interpreted twofold: as a '5', which is more graphically likely, or as a '3', which seems more natural, pianistically speaking. The source of the problem was the will to fit in the digit (apparently added later) under the word loco, ending the octave sign, which forced Chopin to write this digit almost horizontally; consequently, the resulting unnatural shape hampers the identification. The majority of the sources include a '5', whereas in the main text, we suggest a '3', due to practical reasons; it was also GE3 that considered this digit to be right. Such a solution is also supported by AsI, in which one can see deleted digits over the first two notes in the bar, most probably 5-4. In FESB both this digit and the adjacent ones were most probably overlooked (see the previous note). The digit '3' added in pencil in our copy of GE2 is of no source value. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |