![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||
b. 49-51
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In A the bottom notes of the B1-B octave in b. 49-50 and the B category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In A there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||
b. 55-57
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we do not include the fingering added by GE2 (→GE3,FESB) due to its questionable authenticity. It is particularly the use of the 5th and 4th fingers in the 2nd figure in b. 56 and the 1st figure in b. 57 that is dubious – Chopin would repeat the 5th finger in similar contexts, e.g. in the Polonaise in E category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |