Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we suggest marks after analogous bar 346. Chopin wrote similar pairs of marks also in bars 342 and 356. According to us, these pairs of hairpins, as emphasising the brilliant nature of the bravura passages, are to be considered an integral part of notation. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 361
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The omission of the hairpin coupled with the cresc. indication was an arbitrary decision of the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 361
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As before (bars 343 and 347 and bar 357), in EE the horizontal accents were arbitrarily changed to vertical ones. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 362
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The dots having been replaced with wedges was an arbitrary decision of the engraver of GE1 – see bars 271-272. The absence of a dot in A over the penultimate quaver probably resulted from ink stoppage. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||
b. 363
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
Replacing the staccato dots with wedges is a revision, while the omission of the mark over d-d1 – a mistake by the engraver of GE1 (in A the dot merges with the mark). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |