Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 327-329
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As before, all staccato marks used by Chopin, in this case dots, were arbitrarily reproduced in GE as wedges. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||
b. 330
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
According to us, the version of the editions resulted from inattention of the engraver of GE1, who did not notice the change of dynamic indications at the end of the bar. The crescendo in A emphasises the dissonant chord, introducing E major as a new key, constituting the starting point for further modulation. The accent in AsI confirms that from the very beginning Chopin wanted to underline the chord on the 6th quaver in the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 331
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The missing dynamic hairpins under the L.H. part are almost certainly a mistake by the engraver of GE1. It is difficult to determine the exact range of the marks in A, since their arms are of different length. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
b. 335
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 337
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The absence of the wedge in the editions is most probably an oversight by the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |