b. 331
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In AsI and A there is no to the 2nd semiquaver (E), while in A also no to the 13th semiquaver (f). The accidentals were added in GE (→FE,EE). In AsI Chopin did not forget , since he enharmonically wrote the preceding note as f. In the main text we add a cautionary to the 4th semiquaver (G). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Enharmonic corrections |
||||||||||||||
b. 331
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The missing dynamic hairpins under the L.H. part are almost certainly a mistake by the engraver of GE1. It is difficult to determine the exact range of the marks in A, since their arms are of different length. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||||||||
b. 331
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In GE (→FE,EE) the e1 crotchet is provided with two augmentation dots, which could have been caused by the spot in A, resembling a second dot. It must be a mistake, since this e1 note is continued by the d1 quaver, falling on the 4th quaver in the bar. In FESB this note was placed on one stem with the g1 quaver, which changed its value to a double dotted quaver. It was probably an attempt at correcting the excessive rhythmic value of this note. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Different values of chord components , Errors in GE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||||||||
b. 334-335
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In GE, FESB and EE bar 335 opens a new line, which caused the distortion of the slurs ending on the 1st quaver in this bar. In the graphic transcription we reproduce the versions of these editions without changes, whereas in the content transcription (version 'edited text') we give their most likely (according to us) interpretation. In the main text we reproduce the unequivocal notation of A and FE (the notation of FE could have resulted from Chopin's intervention in the copy of GE1 serving him as the basis, since on the basis of the notation of GE it is difficult to guess the correct version, and neither the reviser of EE nor the reviser of FESB succeeded at it). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE , Revisions in FESB |
||||||||||||||
b. 335
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
We add a cautionary before a1 in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |