In AsI the accidentals restoring c1 and b
at the end of b. 137 are missing; the 
raising e1 to e1 in b. 138 is absent too. A similar situation occurs in the L.H. part, which is marked in an abridged manner as doubling in unison the R.H. part. In A and the editions the notation is correct.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Omissions to cancel alteration, Omission of current key accidentals
notation: Pitch