data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
EE1
compare
In this case, it is almost certain that the shorter slur in the editions resulted from a routine approach of the engraver of GE, who adjusted the slur to a half of the bar, thus avoiding the need to engrave its ending in a new line.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in GE
notation: Slurs