data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
A
compare
Taking into account the three previous similar phrases in this bar and d2 in AsI, one could assume an oversight of a
in A. However, it seems more likely that Chopin consciously changed the pitch of this note:
- Chopin would often omit accidentals to notes belonging to the current key; however, he would rarely overlook an accidental supposed to define the alteration (only a few times in his entire oeuvre);
- Chopin did not correct the possible mistake while proofreading FE, despite the fact that he changed slurs in this very bar.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations
issues: Main-line changes
notation: Pitch