Pitch
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In FE there is no raising f1 to f1 in the L.H. chord. The mistake, probably present already in [A], remained unnoticed, in spite of several proofreading rounds of FE. However, it was corrected both in GE and EEW. In the main text we add a cautionary to a. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions |
|||
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The version of GE1 (→GE2) with a pianistically awkward and sonically unjustified cluster of g1 notes played by both hands must be erroneous. However, it is difficult to say how such a serious mistake could have happened when reproducing printed text. The mUltimate Chopin editors believe the following scenario to be most likely: in the proof copy of FE1 serving as the basis for GE this crotchet consisted of two notes, g-e1, which was changed in the finished FE1, as a result of which it became a three-note chord, and in GE1 it was reproduced with a Terzverschreibung as an octave. The mistake was noticed and corrected in GE3, almost certainly on the basis of a comparison with FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In EEW a cautionary was added to f in the L.H., which seems superfluous in this harmonic context. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||
b. 67
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary to f2, as it was performed in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |