![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In GE and EEW the absence of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , No pedal release mark |
|||||||||
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In EEW a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
If we were to take into account the pedalling of the entire Mazurka, the absence of category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , No pedal release mark |
|||||||||
b. 67-70
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The sustention of the g category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 71-72
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The slur starting in bar 71 in FE suggests that it should be continued, which is not confirmed by the beginning of bar 72 (in a new line), in which there is no slur. It is difficult to say whether it was also the case for [A], or whether this version resulted from the engraver's carelessness. In GE1 and EEW the slur of FE was interpreted literally, thus encompassing only two notes in bar 71. However, a comparison with bars 59-60 points to a slur reaching the e category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »