Rhythm
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
In As one can see a tie to the c1 minim in bar 8, sustaining it to the grace note in the next bar. Chopin eventually deleted it; however, it proves that he was considering this operation (not found in other pieces) – an unplayed grace note – and that it could have been used as diversification in bars 48-49 in the final version. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Main-line changes |
|||||
b. 22-23
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
It is possible that the lack of tie to c1 in As is just an inaccuracy of the sketch notation. However, the version of analogous bars 30-31, in which c1 is repeated in all sources, suggests the correctness of the As notation, and therefore, the existence of a real original version of this detail. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
Chopin performed changes to the R.H. bottom voice while proofreading FE2 (→EEW), giving it an analogous form to bar 31. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 23-24
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
The As version with a dotted rhythm in the upper voice was most likely changed by Chopin already in [A] (→FE→GE,EE). However, in bar 24, the first note (g1) was probably remade from a minim to a dotted crotchet, which means that in this bar Chopin changed his mind twice, ultimately returning to the first idea (minim). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Chopin's hesitations , Main-line changes |
|||||
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
Sustaining d1 between bars 25-26 is a subtle diversification of the harmonic progression introduced at the stage of preparing the Mazurka for publication. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accompaniment changes |