|
b. 7-8
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
The absence of fingering in EEW must be an oversight. In the main text we give both the fingering printed in FE (→GE) and the preceding pencil addition in FES – the 4th finger on a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in EE , Annotations in FES |
||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
In As one can see a tie to the c1 minim in bar 8, sustaining it to the grace note in the next bar. Chopin eventually deleted it; however, it proves that he was considering this operation (not found in other pieces) – an unplayed grace note – and that it could have been used as diversification in bars 48-49 in the final version. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Main-line changes |
||||||
|
b. 9-14
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
The non-slashed grace notes in bars 9 and 14 is a systematic inaccuracy of the engraver of GE – all grace notes in the entire opus 63 are non-slashed in GE. As confirms the authenticity of short, slashed grace notes of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
As in bar 4, when preparing the Mazurka for printing, Chopin moved the bass an octave lower. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Bass register changes |
1, which almost certainly comes from Chopin.
before g in the main text. The accidental was also added in 
