b. 71-72
No slur in GE |
In FE a mistake was committed by not continuing the slur in a new line, which was reproduced in EEC as a slur over 4 quavers. In the main text we correct this oversight by leading the slur to c1-e1, as it was interpreted in EEW. The absence of the slur in GE is probably a mistake, although it cannot be excluded that the proof copy of FE1 that served as the basis for GE1 did not yet include this slur – see the note on the slur in bar 69.
See b. 3-4
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, Errors in GE, Uncertain slur continuation
notation: Slurs