data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
This is one of few places in which the difference in the dynamic markings between AI and the published version cannot be reduced to a difference in markings accuracy or to the intention of paying attention to another aspect of the dynamic course. In this case, it is a clearly defined dichotomy. If we take into account the fact that the return of the Mazurka main theme in bar 69 in both versions begins with a firm accent, the FE version (→GE,EE) is undoubtedly more coherent.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations
notation: Verbal indications