Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 138-140
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In FE, the bass clefs at the end of these bars and the treble clef after e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 138
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
Unlike in the case of the agogic markings in b. 125 and 136, it is difficult to find a justification for a possible abandonment of the scherzando indication. Therefore, we include it in the main text; we signalise its absence in the principal source by using brackets. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 141
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The accent was overlooked probably due to an oversight by the engraver of FE (→GE,EE), which Chopin possibly did not notice while proofreading FE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 156-157
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
It seems that the accents – as many other markings – were overlooked by the engraver of FE. However, to respect the image of the text of FE, carefully proofread by Chopin, in the main text we suggest them in a variant form, in brackets. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 158-159
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The L.H. slur in A is written down quite vaguely; moreover, it partially blends in with the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
in b. 139 were overlooked. The patent mistakes were corrected by 
hairpin, which was most probably the reason why it was overlooked by