



Pitch
b. 238
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The bottom note of the three-note chord in the 1st half of the bar is written down in A quite low, hence FE initially interpreted it as f3. It is evidenced by the traces of a correction on the engraving plate visible in FE copies. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccurate note pitch in A , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 243
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The version of GE1a is most probably a mistake by the engraver, although one cannot completely exclude a revision – the cautionary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
||||||
b. 246
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary accidentals – naturals to c1 in the L.H. and to c4 and a category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 247
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A (→FE→EE) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 247
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A, one can see two more deleted notes between the c3 and b2 quavers; in addition, the not entirely removed stem of the former was left untouched. Consequently, it probably caused the mistake of FE, in which one can see traces of removal of a redundant note, most probably c3, placed between d3 and c3. It is uncertain what the aim of the corrections of A was. Below we present a hypothetical reconstruction of a respective fragment with the removed notes having been revealed:
category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , Deletions in A , Authentic corrections of FE |