data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In the main text, we give the simplified notation of FE (→GE,EE). It does not seem that the rests were being removed; however, Chopin did not question this notation while proofreading FE (twice). The notation of A, although justified by the voice leading, constitutes a superfluous complication in this layout. In analogous b. 202-204, the notation of the entire L.H. part on the bottom stave allows for all the rests to be written down without difficulties.
NB. Such a score-like accuracy is quite rare in Chopin's notation; he would generally care for transparency, avoiding rests of formal nature – cf., e.g. the notation of the quaver motifs in the 1st theme of the Ballade, b. 8, 10 and analog. (on this page b. 94 and analog.).
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: FE revisions
notation: Rhythm
Back to note