b. 242
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In the main text we give the accent added probably by Chopin in the stage of proofreading FE (→GE,EE) instead of , which was present in A. There are a few examples of Chopin reducing the number of markings in the refinement stage, e.g. in the Etudes, Op. 10 – in A minor, No. 2 or in E, No. 11. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 242-244
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A, each of the subsequent 7 sextuplets in b. 242-245 is provided with a digit 6 and a separate slur, irrespective of the primary slur encompassing the entire chromatic sequence. Apart from minor inaccuracies, this notation was reproduced in the editions too. Such accuracy in marking a most regular structure is exceptional not only in Chopin's manuscripts, but also in the editorial practices in general. In this situation, we keep it in the main text, although the mUltimate Chopin editors did not find any potential reason for this uncommon notational consistency convincing enough to be worth mentioning. Our alternative suggestion is a simplified notation, adapted to the principles we adhere to in our transcriptions – cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 16. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Triplet slurs |
||||||||
b. 243
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The version of GE1a is most probably a mistake by the engraver, although one cannot completely exclude a revision – the cautionary to b, present in the remaining sources, is not indispensable here and could have been considered erroneous. The engraver or reviser of GE1a was similarly overly zealous in, e.g. b. 232. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 245-246
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A, the slurs between these bars were being corrected – according to us, Chopin divided the initial continuous slur, which is indicated by the endings marking the division of the slur (the endings are clearly bolder, hence more important, final). However, the part of the initial slur that was supposed to be deleted was not eventually removed, hence FE (→EE) understood this correction the other way around (it is also likely that the correction was not there yet when FE was being engraved – see the description of FE). In the main text we give the slurs separated by Chopin. The versions of GE and GE1a, with the slur divided before the last sextuplet and after it, most probably resulted from mistakes or arbitrary revisions. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE , Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 245
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In the main text we reproduce the additional slurs over the sextuplets, consistently present in A (→FE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |