Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 83-97
p. 1, b. 1-16
p. 2, b. 17-34
p. 3, b. 35-48
p. 4, b. 49-64
p. 5, b. 65-82
p. 6, b. 83-97
p. 7, b. 98-112
p. 8, b. 113-126
p. 9, b. 127-157
p. 10, b. 158-185
p. 11, b. 186-214
p. 12, b. 215-243
p. 13, b. 244-267
p. 14, b. 268-281
p. 15, b. 282-295
p. 16, b. 296-309
p. 17, b. 310-326
Main text
Main text
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 83-97

No L.H. slurs in GE1 & FE (→EE)

L.H. slurs in GE2

Adding slurs under the L.H. demisemiquavers (as performed in GE2 in this entire section) is rational – the L.H. part is undoubtedly supposed to be performed with the same articulation as the R.H. one. In such homogeneous texture Chopin would generally leave it to the imagination of the performers, hence we do not include those additions in the main text. In GE2 a similar procedure was applied with respect to the staccato dots – see next note.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: GE1, GE2, FE1, FE2, EE1, EE2, EE3, FES