Page:
Source:
p. 10, b. 158-185
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
The authenticity of the tie of GE does not raise major concerns; there could also be a number of reasons for its absence in FE (→EE), e.g. an oversight of the copyist or of the engraver of FE or the tie having been added to [A] after [FC] had already been finished. On the other hand, it is the version of FE, which repeats e, that is compliant with the version of analogous b. 225-226. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a variant solution.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues:
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
GE1, GE2, FE1, FE2, EE1, EE2, EE3, FES