![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 7, b. 98-112
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
As was the case with analogous b. 31 and 57, the slur of GE, although formally correct, is most probably inaccurate and marks a grace note and an arpeggio (written down as a vertical slur). The missing slur (arpeggio) in FE (→EE) is most probably an oversight by the copyist in [FC] or by the engraver.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Arpeggio – vertical slur
notation: Ornaments
Missing markers on sources:
GE1, GE2, FE1, FE2, EE1, EE2, EE3, FES