Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 45-62
p. 1
p. 2
p. 3
p. 4, b. 1-21
p. 5, b. 22-44
p. 6, b. 45-62
p. 7, b. 63-78
p. 8, b. 79-104
p. 9, b. 105-126
p. 10, b. 127-168
p. 11, b. 169-206
p. 12, b. 207-246
p. 13, b. 247-275
p. 14, b. 276-299
p. 15, b. 300-326
p. 16
EE1 - First English edition
Main text
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF EE1 - First English edition


  b. 55-56

Longer slur in GE

Shorter slur in FE

No slur in EE

In the main text we give the slur from GE, in accordance with slurs in analogous bars 29-30 and 288-289. In the latter passage such slur also occurs in FE (→EE) what proves the shorter FE's slur in bars in question inaccurate. The missing slur in EE is certainly an oversight.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE, Errors in EE

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: GE1, GE2, FE1, FE2, EE1, EE2, EE3, FES