Issues : Errors in EE
|
b. 241
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In EE1 the dots extending the b1-g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 258-260
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In FE b. 260 opens a new line, in which the slur from the preceding bars is not continued, although its ending in b. 259 clearly indicates that it should be continued. It is difficult to say whether this inaccuracy was related to the fact that EE omitted the slur. In the main text we give the slur of GE, which is certainly correct. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , Uncertain slur continuation |
|||||||||||
|
b. 284
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest the markings of FE for the chordal section starting from the syncopated crotchet; there is a possibility to add the staccato dot from GE in analogous b. 25. At the same time, we correct the third accent, which was misplaced, i.e. it was put over the first chord in b. 284 (which is tied!). EE1 repeated the mistake of FE and also overlooked the slur (which was added in EE2). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 286
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The absence of the mark in EE1 is most probably an oversight of the engraver, corrected in EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 312
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
We explain the absence of markings in GE in b. 24-26. The missing staccato dots in EE must be an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE |
2 crotchet were overlooked. The mistake was rectified in 
