Issues : Errors in GE
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The version of GE must be a mistake of the engraver – nothing points to any involvement of Chopin in the creation of that edition, and it is difficult to find a reason for a revision there. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
GE overlooked the crotchet stems prolonging the A notes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
As was the case with b. 3, in A the long accent is placed right under the note; however, in FE it was moved to the right, hence it could be interpreted as a hairpin. This is how it was reproduced – moving it even further to the right – in EE2 (EE1 omitted the mark). The absence of the mark in GE is most probably an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
GE has erroneously c instead of e as the last L.H. note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |