Issues : Errors in EE
b. 10-16
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
EE1 has no signs in the middle of bar 10 and at the end of bars 15-16. These are probably oversights by the engraver. Only the first one was corrected in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
As was the case with b. 3, in A the long accent is placed right under the note; however, in FE it was moved to the right, hence it could be interpreted as a hairpin. This is how it was reproduced – moving it even further to the right – in EE2 (EE1 omitted the mark). The absence of the mark in GE is most probably an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 21-23
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
b. 49-50
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The omitted staccato markings in the editions must be oversights. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |