b. 35
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In the main text we include the fingering entered most probably by Chopin into FES. It is noteworthy that it differs from the one indicated in FED in an analogous passage in b. 17. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES |
||||||
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The missing accent in FC (→GE) must be a result of an oversight of the copyist. The short accent in EE is a typical revision of that edition, in which the majority of long accents were interpreted as diminuendo markings or short accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies , Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
||||||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In A (→FE) there is no before the last note of the roulade, raising d4 to d4. That inaccuracy, typical of Chopin, was corrected in FC (→GE) and EE. However, in FC the added covered the small notehead, as a result of which GE1 interpreted the note as a small protuberance on a ledger line below that note, which resulted in c4. The mistake, patent in this harmonic context, was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC , Fontana's revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
||||||
b. 36-37
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In the main text we include the fingering written down by the pupil and coming most probably from Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |