Issues : Errors in FE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
The typical long accent written in A was reproduced in FC less vividly, as a result of which GE gave a short accent. FE (→EE1) overlooked the mark, while EE2 added it after GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||
b. 64-65
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
||||||
b. 75-80
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
When interpreted literally, the dim. abbreviation fills an entire bar in A. It resulted in a difference in the placement of the indication between FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). According to us, the manner in which it was written down suggests that it is related to the 3rd beat of the bar, hence in the main text we prefer the placement proposed in FE (→EE). However, those editions overlooked the dashes marking the range of the dynamic change; we add them after A. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in A |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »