![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 11, Prelude in B major
..
FE overlooked the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FEJ |
|||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 11, Prelude in B major
..
We adda a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 20-21
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 11, Prelude in B major
..
The slurs of A between b. 20 and 21 may be questionable – when interpreted literally, the latter begins before the bar line, which could be interpreted as two slurs coinciding on the f category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors of FC |
|||||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 11, Prelude in B major
..
We reproduce the grace note and the curved lines in principle after the notation of A, in which, however, the slur running from the grace note to the f
EE2 supplemented the FE version with a grace note taken from GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors of FC , Fontana's revisions |