![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Annotations in teaching copies
b. 4-5
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
..
In the main text we include the fingering entered most probably by Chopin into FES. In addition to digits, there is also a mark implying that the e category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||
b. 12-13
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
..
In the main text we include the fingering written by Chopin into FE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED |
||||||||||||
b. 45-47
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
..
The quaver beam added in FES to the last three quavers most probably indicates that they should be performed by the R.H. Since it concerns fingering, in the main text we also give it in analogous b. 45 (cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 17). In b. 45 it is convenient to perform this motif with the R.H. already from the 2nd quaver, e. The fingering of EE contradicts both indications in FES, i.e. here and in a similar phrase in b. 49. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |