FC
compare
b. 9
The fact that the indication was repeated in GE1 resulted from distraction of the engraver; he did not notice (did not understand?) the indication written in the abridged marking of that bar in FC. The mistake was rectified in GE2 (→GE3). See also the note to b. 11-12.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE, GE revisions
notation: Verbal indications