![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 1-2
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor
..
FE erroneously gives d instead of c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor
..
In contrast with A, in FE (→EE) the last L.H. figure was written in the treble clef, thanks to which it was not necessary to repeat the flats next to the 2nd and 3rd semiquavers. However, FE1 misinterpreted the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor
..
FE and GE did not use the abridged notation of the 2nd and 4th beats of the bar applied in A (→FC); however, none of the accidentals was repeated on those beats in FE1, which resulted in a mistake in the 4th R.H. group – first, c3 was not raised to c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||
b. 31-32
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor
..
The division of the slur between the bars must be a mistake of the engraver, probably misled by the shortness of the bars in A, written in an abridged manner. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |