b. 26-28
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
As was the case in b. 18 and 20, Chopin changed in A the last L.H. note from g to d. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
||||||||
b. 26-27
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
Performing the 3rd beat of b. 26 and the 1st beat of b. 27 with one pedal is inconceivable in the sonic atmosphere of the Prelude, although it is difficult to state what misled Chopin and which pedalling markings he wanted to insert here. According to us, it is most likely that it was to be the initial pedalling in b. 18-19: . Chopin could have wanted to forgo the first change of pedal in b. 27 (after b. 25: ), yet he wrote the pedal encompassing 2 beats a triplet too early. In the main text we give the unequivocal, final pedalling of analogous b. 18-19. As an alternative solution, we give the literally interpreted version of A, supplemented with a pedal change between b. 26-27, as well as a variant version, which includes both aforementioned possibilities. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors of A |
||||||||
b. 28-32
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
These bars constitute the last line of the 1st page in FC. Perhaps this was the reason for the copyist's distraction, since he overlooked all performing indications therein – pedalling, the hairpin, the cresc. - - - indication and the R.H. slur at the end of this section. None of the above markings are in GE1; in turn, GE2 (→GE3) added only the cresc. - - - indication. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
In front of the first R.H. quaver (a2), A and the remaining sources have a (cautionary?) which we omit in the main text as groundless. category imprint: Editorial revisions |