data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The analysis of the difference in the notation between the two autographs makes one wonder whether prolonging of the bass note in A has practical meaning or whether it is only conventional notation employed to end a structurally important phrase with the tonic in root position.
Initially, A had the following version (later deleted and replaced): .
There would be nothing strange about the later adding of a pair of quavers in the R.H., making the melodic connection with bar 1 smoother, if not for the fact that in AI that element was already written in its final shape.
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations
issues: Corrections in A, Accompaniment changes, Main-line changes
notation: Rhythm
Back to note