![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
A (→FE) has a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Errors of FC |
|||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
The change of the number of beams introduced by GE is wrong – in a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 11-12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
In the main text, we add – as in bars 9-10 – separate wedges to the :\L.H. octaves. In the discussed bars, this notation also occurs in FE (→EE). The mark in b. 12 was overlooked in FC (→GE), and the other (a wedge in b. 11) was reproduced in GE as a staccato dot. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , FE revisions , Wedges , Errors of FC |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
Formally speaking, the version of GE is justified here; however, it is highly likely that Chopin wrote this group in semiquavers (like all the others) because he did not want to unnecessarily suggest a significant acceleration of movement. Such a notation is to be found in his pieces on a number of occasions – cf., e.g. the Prelude in D category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
In A (→FC,FE1) there are no accidentals before the last semiquaver (in both hands), which, when interpreted literally, gives d1 and d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |