Issues : Errors in GE
b. 1-6
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
None of the editions based on manuscripts reproduced all 4 slurs over the pairs of chords in bars 1-2 and 5-6. EE1 overlooked yet 2 out of 3 slurs in FE. The complete set of slurs in EE2 results from a compilation of the slur of EE1 with the slurs reproduced from GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
The change of the number of beams introduced by GE is wrong – in a bar, it is groups including at least 32 notes (but less than 64) that should be written as demisemiquavers. In this situation, the fact that this mistake was repeated in EE2 is puzzling. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 13-14
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
Each of the chords on the 2nd beat of these bars is provided with a pair of staccato marks in A (→FE→EE), one for each hand. The change of notation with respect to the previous bars can be explained by the change of layout – the R.H. chords are written entirely on the top stave here, as a result of which the validity of the marks placed over the R.H. in the L.H. is not so obvious anymore. According to us, it is another argument confirming the accuracy of our interpretation of the marks in b. 9-12. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , Wedges , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
The missing e1 in GE1 must be an oversight of the engraver. The mistake was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |