Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Verbal indications
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Verbal indications

b. 1

composition: Op. 28 No. 6, Prelude in B minor

..

In A one can see that the initial tempo marking was Largo. Cf. changes of markings in adjacent Preludes.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A

b. 13

composition: Op. 28 No. 6, Prelude in B minor

No indications in A (→FCGE, →FEEE) & CGS

in FEJ

 &  in FES

( & ) – our variant suggestion

..

Both versions of the dynamic indications written in the teaching copies point to the use of the echo effect. In the main text we give the indications of FES, in which the idea of contrast is expressed in a clearer form.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEJ

b. 15-16

composition: Op. 28 No. 6, Prelude in B minor

No indications in A (→FCGE, →FEEE) & CGS

cresc. &  in FES

Our variant suggestion

..

In the main text we include – in a variant version – the teaching entries in FES, which are not very clear, but still legible. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES

b. 20-21

composition: Op. 28 No. 6, Prelude in B minor

No markings in A (→FCGE, →FEEE) & CGS

in FES

Our variant suggestion

..

In the main text we include the most likely interpretation of the poorly legible Chopinesque teaching entries in FES.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES